When the Court inquired about the rationale behind the decision, the DSGI cited Guidelines issued by the Central Government pursuant to Section 5B(2) of the Cinematograph Act, 1952. The Guidelines detail the grounds on which the CBFC grants, restrict or denies certification to a film for public exhibition.
As per guideline 2 (xi) of the Guidelines, “visuals or words contemptuous of racial, religious or other groups are not presented.”
The DSGI told the Court that the narrative of the film deals with mature content, includes sexual violence against women and uses sexual language and words denoting women and thus, the name ‘Janaki’ should not be used in this context.
The Court eventually told the production to either reply to the show cause notice or to prefer an appeal against it.
Counsel appearing for the production contended that the Revising Committee does not have any power to issue a show cause notice as per the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983. The Committee has to view the movie and issue a certificate subject to whatever cuts that they make, stated the counsel.
The Court then directed that the show cause notice be placed before it on Monday (June 30).
Background
Cosmos Entertainment, the company which has produced the Malayalam movie ‘JSK – Janaki v/s State of Kerala’, had moved the Kerala High Court against the delay by the Central Board of Film Certification in certifying the film.
Notably, Suresh Gopi, a BJP politician and Union Minister of State for Petroleum and Natural Gas, is starring in the movie.
As per the petitioner, they had submitted the film for certification through the e-cinemapramaan portal on 12.06.2025, and the censor screening of the movie was completed on 18.06.2025. It is mentioned in the petition that though CBFC has not raised any formal objection till date, they have come to know from newspaper reports that the Board has directed to change the name ‘Janaki’ of the titular character, saying that it refers to the Hindu goddess ‘Sita’.
According to the petitioner, the continued delay is causing financial loss and violating their rights under Article 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
Case Title: M/s Cosmos Entertainments v The Regional Officer, CBFC and Others
